- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:52:33 +1100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 25/10/2011, at 3:41 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-07-18 08:05, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> I think we're hitting diminishing returns here, and possibly approaching the angels dancing on the pins. >> >> If someone has a proposal for a text change that they think will represent consensus, great. >> >> In the meantime, I don't see any pushback on the proposed resolution, as it affects p1. >> ... > > So what is the proposed resolution? The original e-mail said: > 1xx responses are non-final; i.e., the underlying model is that for each request, there are 0 to many non-final responses, and exactly one final response. > > This should be made explicit at a high level; it's implied by the definition of 1xx, but never really spelled out anywhere. ... so it needs some text, probably somewhere in or around p1 2.1 "Client/Server Messaging". Do you want to take a stab at it, or would you like a textual proposal? -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2011 23:53:04 UTC