- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:53:43 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@me.com>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
On 2011-10-19 01:57, Mark Nottingham wrote: > FYI. Some adjustment of the status codes in -01, and one new one (thanks to Jan for the idea). > ... Looks good. Let's finish this. One concern, one nit: - it's suboptimal that we have an example of a Refresh header field with no spec for it (that could be worked around by making it a META tag in the response body) - in appendix B, s/network filesystem access/remote authoring/. Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 22 October 2011 07:54:23 UTC