- From: Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:15:58 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 17 October 2011 11:16:46 UTC
SGTM. On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Currently, all of the cache-control directives (e.g., max-age) are defined > as BNF strings, which means that they're case-insensitive. > > However, theoretically someone could define a directive without using a > string (as we do for some other constructs, e.g., the HTTP version > identifier), which means that it'd be case-sensitive. > > It seems that having such exceptions would be surprising, and that the most > straightforward thing to do would be to define CC directive names as > case-insensitive. > > Any thoughts? A quick check of squid2 shows it case-normalising them before > comparison. > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > >
Received on Monday, 17 October 2011 11:16:46 UTC