Re: Cache-Control directive case sensitivity

SGTM.

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Currently, all of the cache-control directives (e.g., max-age) are defined
> as BNF strings, which means that they're case-insensitive.
>
> However, theoretically someone could define a directive without using a
> string (as we do for some other constructs, e.g., the HTTP version
> identifier), which means that it'd be case-sensitive.
>
> It seems that having such exceptions would be surprising, and that the most
> straightforward thing to do would be to define CC directive names as
> case-insensitive.
>
> Any thoughts? A quick check of squid2 shows it case-normalising them before
> comparison.
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 17 October 2011 11:16:46 UTC