- From: Andreas Petersson <andreas@sbin.se>
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:22:18 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 23:26:25 +0000 "Darrel Miller" <darrel@tavis.ca> wrote: > >5.5. Private extensions > > > > Private extensions allow for adding own parameters and values. > > Private parameters MUST be prepended with "x-". This may be > > particularly useful in a reverse proxy environment. > > Can I suggest that for the same reasons that using x- for provisional > message headers is not recommended that you do not require x- as a parameter > prefix? > I was not aware of draft-saintandre-xdash when I wrote this draft. It seems appropriate to include a reference to this. As draft-saintandre-xdash is only a draft yet, how can I update draft-petersson-forwarded-for to take this x- deprecation into account? Suggested formulations are welcome. > Also, it would be nice to have a "from" parameter, as alternative to the > >From Http header, that allowed the use of a URN to identify the requesting > user rather than being limited to an email address. > If the from field should be specified in this draft, which might be a good idea, I think the value should be specified to refer to http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-16#section-9.3 or RFC2616 section 14.22. I don't see the usecase for it, containing an URN. More important, I don't think it would be appropriate to divert the semantics, or syntax of the field from the definition in RFC2616 / draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics. Regards, Andreas Petersson
Received on Monday, 10 October 2011 10:23:01 UTC