Re: I-D draft-petersson-forwarded-for-01.txt

• From: Andreas Petersson <andreas@sbin.se>
• Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:12:13 +0200
• To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
• CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <4E8C9DFD.2090908@sbin.se>

On 10/5/11 12:38 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20111005123338.320c38d4@hetzer>, Andreas Petersson writes:
> 
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-petersson-forwarded-for-01.txt
>>
>> Please comment.
> 
> ]       proto-kv   = "proto=" ( "http" | "https" )
> 
> Given Speedy, Websockets and other such experiments, shouldn't this
> allow any protocol-name ?
> 

Yes, I guess that sounds quite reasonable. But will every protocol
always only have one unique name, that everyone would use, without need
for discussion?

Another, perhaps a non-issue, would be name changes (somewhat like
jabber vs. xmpp or yp vs. nis).

/Andreas Petersson

Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2011 18:12:53 UTC