Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 04:13:57PM +0200, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Roy, Julian and I discussed this, and agreed that (a) and (b) are both valid. So, we propose this patch which will show up in -14:
> 
>   http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1214
> 
> ... which should let us close #95. Any thoughts / objections?

Seems fine to me. It indicates that this annoying case exists, suggests
how to openly deal with it without forcing anyone to support it.

Willy

Received on Sunday, 27 March 2011 14:35:56 UTC