- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 23:21:46 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 09.03.2011 19:04, Mark Nottingham wrote: > I've scheduled this for -13. > > <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/95#comment:20> > > > On 20/02/2011, at 11:12 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > >> So, I propose: >> >> * adding text that allows duplicates explicitly, and >> >> * upgrading the SHOULD to a MUST in this requirement: >> >> If this is a response message received by a user-agent, it SHOULD be treated >> as an error by discarding the message and closing the connection. ...clarifying: you say "adding text that allows duplicates explicitly"... that could be read to REQUIRE recipients to accept those duplicates -- are we really going to declare recipients that do not do that to be non-compliant? If we do, we *probably* need to adjust the header field ABNF (because "x, x" doesn't parse), which I'd rather do not... Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 22:22:34 UTC