- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:21:35 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 23.02.2011 11:43, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > (3) isn't ideal, but it does perform as advertised; i.e., the UA falls back to the filename parameter. Well, Firefox does not "fall back", it "trips over". This would mean that we recommend a format that breaks the UA which has been doing the "right thing" since "ever", just because some *other* UAs do not. I don't think we should do that, at least not until <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588781> is fixed. So I'd prefer no advice over bad advice here. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 11:22:16 UTC