- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 09:34:18 +0100
- To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
- CC: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, ietf-message-headers@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
On 08.01.2011 07:21, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > Hello all, > > This document summarizes the Last Call for > draft-yevstifeyev-http-headers-not-recognized. > > The Last Call was requested on 11 December, 2010 by Alexey Melnikov and > was announced on 13 November, 2010. The period of 32 days has been > assigned for this Last Call, that ends on 14 January, 2011. > > The Last call has been requested for version -08. However during the > Last Call 3 new versions appeared. The latest one is -11, submitted on 8 > January, 2011 If a draft changes three times during LC, there may be a problem. I encourage you to go back to the drawing board, and think hard(er about the feedback you got, in particular <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010OctDec/0645.html>. I also mentioned at least once that in many frameworks this is essentially un-implementable, as different types of header fields are processed by different, independent layers in the code, and thus there's no way some part of the code will ever *know* which headers have been "processed". Do you think that this is not a problem? > ... > * Syntax: Changed. Now is not /token**/but /1*VCAHR /for definition > of the name of the header. > ... Why? Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 8 January 2011 08:35:05 UTC