ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2011 by date

Thursday, 31 March 2011

link to old keep-alive notes Roy T. Fielding
httpbis wg followup - DOSETA discussion list Dave CROCKER
Re: Updated Prague agenda / remote participation details Julian Reschke
draft-bryan-metalinkhttp-22 and redirects Matt Domsch

Wednesday, 30 March 2011

Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code Julian Reschke
PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code Dominik Tomaszuk

Tuesday, 29 March 2011

Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Bill Burke

Wednesday, 30 March 2011

DOSETA discussion list Dave CROCKER
Re: I-D Action:draft-snell-http-prefer-03.txt Julian Reschke
Re: I-D Action:draft-snell-http-prefer-03.txt Poul-Henning Kamp
RE: I-D Action:draft-snell-http-prefer-03.txt Thomson, Martin
Re: I-D Action:draft-snell-http-prefer-03.txt Cyrus Daboo

Tuesday, 29 March 2011

IETF tutorial-segment (was Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt) Dave CROCKER

Monday, 28 March 2011

Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Bill Burke

Tuesday, 29 March 2011

Re: I-D Action:draft-snell-http-prefer-03.txt Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: I-D Action:draft-snell-http-prefer-03.txt Roy T. Fielding
Re: I-D Action:draft-snell-http-prefer-03.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-snell-http-prefer-03.txt Poul-Henning Kamp
Fwd: I-D Action:draft-snell-http-prefer-03.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Dave CROCKER
Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Dave CROCKER

Monday, 28 March 2011

FW: HTTP authentication side meeting Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Protocol Action: 'Use of the Content-Disposition Header Field in the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-09.txt) Mark Nottingham
Updated Prague agenda / remote participation details Mark Nottingham
Protocol Action: 'Use of the Content-Disposition Header Field in the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-09.txt) The IESG
Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-09.txt Julian Reschke
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
RE: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Thomson, Martin

Sunday, 27 March 2011

Re: Implementation experience feeding into http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-01.txt? Mark Nottingham
Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Willy Tarreau
Re: Implementation experience feeding into http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-01.txt? Mark Nottingham
Re: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses Mark Nottingham
Re: API Rate Limits and HTTP Code [#255] Mark Nottingham
Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Dave CROCKER

Friday, 25 March 2011

Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Bill Burke

Thursday, 24 March 2011

Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Bill Burke
Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Bill Burke
Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Bill Burke

Wednesday, 23 March 2011

Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Bill Burke

Sunday, 27 March 2011

Re: DOSETA and MIMEAUTH Dave CROCKER
Re: #273: HTTP-Version should be redefined as fixed length pair of DIGIT . DIGIT Willy Tarreau
#273: HTTP-Version should be redefined as fixed length pair of DIGIT . DIGIT Mark Nottingham
Re: DOSETA and MIMEAUTH Mark Nottingham
#104: Header Type Defaulting Mark Nottingham
Re: About draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-01.txt Willy Tarreau

Saturday, 26 March 2011

DOSETA and MIMEAUTH Dave CROCKER

Friday, 25 March 2011

Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Cyrus Daboo
RE: About draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-01.txt Brian Pane
Implementation experience feeding into http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-01.txt? Mike Belshe
RE: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Alexey Melnikov
RE: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Cyrus Daboo

Thursday, 24 March 2011

Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Mark Nottingham
RE: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Mark Nottingham
RE: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Eran Hammer-Lahav
RE: Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Thomson, Martin

Wednesday, 23 March 2011

Feedback on draft-burke-content-signature-00.txt Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 22 March 2011

[vixie@isc.org: googlebot to the rescue] Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: About draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-01.txt Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: About draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-01.txt Willy Tarreau
Issues addressed in the -13 drafts Mark Nottingham
Re: About draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-01.txt Mark Nottingham

Monday, 21 March 2011

Re: more HTTP timeout comments Mark Nottingham

Friday, 18 March 2011

RE: more HTTP timeout comments Thomson, Martin

Wednesday, 16 March 2011

Preliminary agenda for Prague Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 15 March 2011

Monday, 14 March 2011

Re: About draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-01.txt Mark Nottingham
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-08.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
About draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-01.txt Willy Tarreau
Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-01.txt Mark Nottingham
httpbis -13 drafts Julian Reschke
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-13.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-13.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-13.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-13.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-13.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-13.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-13.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-07.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

Saturday, 12 March 2011

Re: more HTTP timeout comments Wenbo Zhu
Re: Introduction Adrian Chadd

Friday, 11 March 2011

more HTTP timeout comments Mark Nottingham
Re: Introduction Mark Nottingham
Re: Question on new PUT section Roy T. Fielding
Re: Introduction Roy T. Fielding
Re: Question on new PUT section Julian Reschke
Re: Question on new PUT section Roy T. Fielding
Question on new PUT section Robert Brewer
Introduction Poul-Henning Kamp

Thursday, 10 March 2011

Fwd: [hybi] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-hybi-http-timeout-00 Mark Nottingham
Issue 281, was: Unclear example for private parameters on Accept headers Julian Reschke
Unclear example for private parameters on Accept headers Karl Dubost
Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Willy Tarreau
Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Adrien de Croy

Wednesday, 9 March 2011

Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Willy Tarreau
Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths William A. Rowe Jr.
Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Willy Tarreau
Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Willy Tarreau
Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Adrien de Croy
Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Julian Reschke
Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Roy T. Fielding
Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Julian Reschke
Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 8 March 2011

Re: Content-Disposition: LWS in parameter ABNF; was: ISSUE-280: whitespace in parameter syntax? Julian Reschke

Monday, 7 March 2011

Re: Content-Disposition: LWS in parameter ABNF; was: ISSUE-280: whitespace in parameter syntax? Roy T. Fielding
FYI: MPEG Dash (adaptive streaming over HTTP) Mark Nottingham
Fwd: I-D Action:draft-thomson-hybi-http-timeout-00.txt Julian Reschke
Re: "chunked" as non-final transfer-extension Julian Reschke
Re: Content-Disposition: LWS in parameter ABNF; was: ISSUE-280: whitespace in parameter syntax? Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 6 March 2011

"chunked" as non-final transfer-extension Bjoern Hoehrmann
Content-Disposition: LWS in parameter ABNF; was: ISSUE-280: whitespace in parameter syntax? Julian Reschke
Re: Link header is representation metadata? Nathan
Re: Link header is representation metadata? Jonathan Rees
ISSUE-280: whitespace in parameter syntax? Julian Reschke
Re: conformance languages (issue 278), was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-06.txt> (Use of the Content-Disposition Header Field in the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)) to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke

Thursday, 3 March 2011

Fwd: [http-state] Protocol Action: 'HTTP State Management Mechanism' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-23.txt) Julian Reschke

Wednesday, 2 March 2011

Re: conformance languages (issue 278), was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-06.txt> (Use of the Content-Disposition Header Field in the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)) to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 1 March 2011

Monday, 28 February 2011

Saturday, 26 February 2011

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-06.txt Julian Reschke
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-06.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Re: Content-Disposition: *sender* advice Julian Reschke

Friday, 25 February 2011

Re: Content-Disposition: *sender* advice Julian Reschke
Re: Content-Disposition: *sender* advice Ben Niven-Jenkins
Re: Content-Disposition: *sender* advice Julian Reschke
Fwd: HTTPBIS - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 80 Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 24 February 2011

Re: Content-Disposition: *sender* advice Julian Reschke
Re: Content-Disposition: *sender* advice Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 23 February 2011

Re: Content-Disposition: *sender* advice Julian Reschke
Re: Content-Disposition: *sender* advice Mark Nottingham
Re: Content-Disposition: *sender* advice Julian Reschke
Re: Content-Disposition: *sender* advice Julian Reschke
Re: Content-Disposition: *sender* advice Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 22 February 2011

Re: Content-Disposition: *sender* advice Julian Reschke
Re: progress on Issue 137 Julian Reschke
Re: progress on Issue 137 Ben Niven-Jenkins

Monday, 21 February 2011

Re: Sec-* headers Mark Nottingham
Re: Sec-* headers Adam Barth
Re: Sec-* headers Mark Nottingham
Sec-* headers Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] Mark Nottingham
Re: #268: Clarify "public" Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 19 February 2011

Issue 275 (duplicate ABNF for "Method"), was: progress on Issue 137 Julian Reschke

Friday, 18 February 2011

Re: Draft on HTTP Warnings registry, was: Using extension points without registries Mark Nottingham
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-portal-02 Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 17 February 2011

Re: #243: iso-8859-1 in C-D Julian Reschke
progress on Issue 137 Julian Reschke
Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-05.txt Julian Reschke
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-05.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

Wednesday, 16 February 2011

Re: Content-Location: conformance and error handling Julian Reschke
Re: 409 Conflict - exposing more details Julian Reschke
Re: 409 Conflict - exposing more details Benjamin Niven-Jenkins

Tuesday, 15 February 2011

Content-Disposition: *sender* advice Julian Reschke
Re: 409 Conflict - exposing more details Julian Reschke
Re: 409 Conflict - exposing more details Wenbo Zhu

Monday, 14 February 2011

Re: 409 Conflict - exposing more details Julian Reschke
Re: 409 Conflict - exposing more details Roy T. Fielding
Re: 409 Conflict - exposing more details Julian Reschke
Re: 409 Conflict - exposing more details Jan Algermissen
409 Conflict - exposing more details Julian Reschke

Friday, 11 February 2011

Re: Content-Location: path separator characters [#272] Julian Reschke
Re: Content-Location: conformance and error handling Karl Dubost

Thursday, 10 February 2011

Re: API Rate Limits and HTTP Code [#255] Karl Dubost
Content-Disposition: conformance and error handling, was: Content-Location: conformance and error handling Julian Reschke
Re: Content-Location: character set Martin J. Dürst
Re: Content-Location: character set Julian Reschke
Re: Content-Location: path separator characters [#272] Julian Reschke
Prague Mark Nottingham
Re: Content-Location: character set Mark Nottingham
Re: Content-Location: character set Anne van Kesteren
Re: API Rate Limits and HTTP Code [#255] Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW: #225: PUT and DELETE invalidation vs. staleness Mark Nottingham
Re: Does no-store in request imply no-cache? [#249] Mark Nottingham
Re: Content-Location: character set Mark Nottingham
Re: Content-Location: character set Martin J. Dürst
Content-Location: character set Mark Nottingham
Re: Content-Location: path separator characters [#272] Mark Nottingham
Content-Location: path separator characters Mark Nottingham
Content-Location: conformance and error handling Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 5 February 2011

Re: Content-Disposition cardinality / priority [was: TICKET 259: 'treat as invalid' not defined] Adam Barth

Friday, 4 February 2011

Re: Content-Disposition cardinality / priority [was: TICKET 259: 'treat as invalid' not defined] Mark Nottingham
Re: Does no-store in request imply no-cache? [#249] Mark Nottingham
Re: Does no-store in request imply no-cache? [#249] Alex Rousskov
FYI: using extension methods with Java's HttpURLConnection Julian Reschke
Re: \-decoding filename parameters [general issue now #270] Ben Niven-Jenkins
Re: \-decoding filename parameters [general issue now #270] Julian Reschke
Re: \-decoding filename parameters [general issue now #270] Ben Niven-Jenkins
Re: \-decoding filename parameters [general issue now #270] Julian Reschke
Re: \-decoding filename parameters [general issue now #270] Mark Nottingham
Re: Does no-store in request imply no-cache? [#249] Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 3 February 2011

Re: Content-Disposition cardinality / priority [was: TICKET 259: 'treat as invalid' not defined] Adam Barth
Re: Content-Disposition cardinality / priority [was: TICKET 259: 'treat as invalid' not defined] Julian Reschke
Re: \-decoding filename parameters [was: TICKET 259: 'treat as invalid' not defined] Julian Reschke
Re: Does no-store in request imply no-cache? [#249] Alex Rousskov
Re: issues addressed in the -12 drafts Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW: #225: PUT and DELETE invalidation vs. staleness Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses Mark Nottingham
Re: Does no-store in request imply no-cache? [#249] Mark Nottingham
#268: Clarify "public" Mark Nottingham
issues addressed in the -12 drafts Mark Nottingham
Content-Disposition cardinality / priority [was: TICKET 259: 'treat as invalid' not defined] Mark Nottingham
\-decoding filename parameters [was: TICKET 259: 'treat as invalid' not defined] Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 1 February 2011

Re: Link header is representation metadata? Nathan
Re: Link header is representation metadata? Roy T. Fielding
Link header is representation metadata? Nathan

Saturday, 29 January 2011

Re: API Rate Limits and HTTP Code [#255] Mark Nottingham
Re: API Rate Limits and HTTP Code [#255] Karl Dubost
Re: API Rate Limits and HTTP Code [#255] Mark Nottingham

Friday, 28 January 2011

Re: API Rate Limits and HTTP Code [#255] Bryce Nesbitt

Wednesday, 26 January 2011

Re: Content-Location q Ben Niven-Jenkins
Fwd: Last Call for Navigation Timing API Mark Nottingham
Re: [apps-discuss] For consideration as an appsawg document: draft-nottingham-http-portal Barry Leiba
Re: [apps-discuss] For consideration as an appsawg document: draft-nottingham-http-portal Mark Nottingham
Re: Content-Location q Mark Nottingham
Re: [saag] [websec] [apps-discuss] [kitten] HTTP authentication: the next generation Mark Nottingham
Re: API Rate Limits and HTTP Code [#255] Mark Nottingham

Friday, 21 January 2011

Re: Final question on the topic of CL Benjamin Niven-Jenkins
Re: Retry-After header on 20X response -- HTTP/1.1 spec extension? Bryce Nesbitt
Final question on the topic of CL Nathan
Re: API Rate Limits and HTTP Code [#255] Bryce Nesbitt
Re: Retry-After header on 20X response -- HTTP/1.1 spec extension? Bryce Nesbitt
Re: Content-Location q Eric J. Bowman
Re: Content-Location q Benjamin Niven-Jenkins
Re: Content-Location q Nathan
Re: Content-Location q Nathan
Re: Content-Location q Ben Niven-Jenkins
Re: Content-Location q Nathan
Content-Location q Nathan
Fwd: Last Call: <draft-bryan-metalinkhttp-19.txt> (Metalink/HTTP: Mirrors and Cryptographic Hashes in HTTP Header Fields) to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke
Re: [hybi] OPTIONS (was Re: It's time to ship) Julian Reschke

Thursday, 20 January 2011

Re: Indicating a resource does not exist Nathan
Re: Indicating a resource does not exist Henry Story
Re: Indicating a resource does not exist Nathan
Re: Indicating a resource does not exist Nathan
Re: Indicating a resource does not exist Ben Niven-Jenkins
Re: Indicating a resource does not exist Robert Sanderson
Re: Indicating a resource does not exist Tim Williams
Re: Indicating a resource does not exist Henry Story
Re: Indicating a resource does not exist Nathan
Re: Indicating a resource does not exist Nathan
Re: Indicating a resource does not exist Joe Gregorio
Re: Indicating a resource does not exist Nathan
Re: Indicating a resource does not exist Joe Gregorio
Re: draft-bryan-metalinkhttp-18.txt Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
Re: Status code questions Julian Reschke
Indicating a resource does not exist Nathan
Re: Resource states (initial and final) Michael Hausenblas
Resource states (initial and final) Nathan
Status code questions Nathan

Wednesday, 19 January 2011

Re: draft-bryan-metalinkhttp-18.txt Anthony Bryan
Re: draft-bryan-metalinkhttp-18.txt Julian Reschke
Re: draft-bryan-metalinkhttp-18.txt Anthony Bryan
Re: draft-bryan-metalinkhttp-18.txt Julian Reschke
Re: draft-bryan-metalinkhttp-18.txt Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
Re: draft-bryan-metalinkhttp-18.txt Julian Reschke
Re: draft-bryan-metalinkhttp-18.txt Anthony Bryan

Sunday, 16 January 2011

Re: draft-bryan-metalinkhttp-18.txt Julian Reschke

Friday, 14 January 2011

Tuesday, 11 January 2011

Draft on HTTP Warnings registry, was: Using extension points without registries Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Re: *NOT* using extension points without registries, was: [Ietf-message-headers] Last Call Summary on draft-yevstifeyev-http-headers-not-recognized Mykyta Yevstifeyev

Monday, 10 January 2011

Sunday, 9 January 2011

Saturday, 8 January 2011

Re: [apps-discuss] [saag] [websec] [kitten] HTTP authentication: the next generation Zed A. Shaw
Re: [apps-discuss] [saag] [websec] [kitten] HTTP authentication: the next generation Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [apps-discuss] [saag] [websec] [kitten] HTTP authentication: the next generation Blaine Cook
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Last Call Summary on draft-yevstifeyev-http-headers-not-recognized Julian Reschke
Re: [saag] [websec] [kitten] HTTP authentication: the next generation Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [saag] [websec] [kitten] HTTP authentication: the next generation Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Last Call Summary on draft-yevstifeyev-http-headers-not-recognized Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Last Call Summary on draft-yevstifeyev-http-headers-not-recognized Julian Reschke
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Last Call Summary on draft-yevstifeyev-http-headers-not-recognized Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Last Call Summary on draft-yevstifeyev-http-headers-not-recognized Julian Reschke
Last Call Summary on draft-yevstifeyev-http-headers-not-recognized Mykyta Yevstifeyev

Friday, 7 January 2011

Re: [http-auth] [websec] HTTP authentication: the next generation Tim
Re: [websec] HTTP authentication: the next generation Simon Josefsson
Re: [websec] HTTP authentication: the next generation Simon Josefsson
Re: [saag] [websec] [kitten] HTTP authentication: the next generation Ben Laurie
Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location requested Julian Reschke
Clarification on use of Content-Location requested Nathan

Thursday, 6 January 2011

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-05.txt Julian Reschke
Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-05.txt mike amundsen
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-05.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Re: [saag] [websec] [kitten] HTTP authentication: the next generation Ben Laurie
Re: [websec] [kitten] [saag] HTTP authentication: the next generation Tim
Re: [websec] [kitten] [saag] HTTP authentication: the next generation David Morris
Re: [websec] [kitten] [saag] HTTP authentication: the next generation Ben Laurie
Re: [kitten] [saag] HTTP authentication: the next generation Robert Sayre

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:21:23 UTC