- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:45:39 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 01:29:07PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-06-30 12:44, Amos Jeffries wrote: > >... > >Ditto for squid. Was only waiting a consensus on this thread. > > > >413 is currently only sent on too-big request body entities. I think due > >to interpretation of the old term/words "request entity". > > ... > > Indeed. If we want to recommend 413 for this, we probably should tune > that definition. Yes, RFC2616 used to introduce many terms which were not that common and could be interpreted differently from what was expected. "Entity" certainly was one of these. Willy
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2011 12:46:40 UTC