- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:52:38 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <4E0C2885.1090702@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes: >On 2011-06-30 09:37, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message<70295C66-3411-4AF7-83E8-775851DACCFB@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri >> tes: >>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/231> >>> >>> Proposal: >> >>> Authors of new header fields are advised to consider documenting: >> >> * How the header field impacts caching. > >Can a new header field affect caching? If not, we should say so. ...not that I think that will have any effect. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2011 07:53:00 UTC