- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:40:17 +1000
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
New headers can't impact caching on their own; if you mean that authors should document how their header might *interact* with caching, certainly. Cheers, On 30/06/2011, at 5:37 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <70295C66-3411-4AF7-83E8-775851DACCFB@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri > tes: >> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/231> >> >> Proposal: > >> Authors of new header fields are advised to consider documenting: > > * How the header field impacts caching. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2011 07:40:44 UTC