- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:19:50 +0200
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-05-27 13:41, Julian Reschke wrote: > Hi there, > > 1) draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disposition is now close to publication, > with editorial fixes being applied; I'm tracking the changes at > <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-latest-from-previous.diff.html>. Published as RFC 6266 -- "pretty" version at <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc6266.html>. > 2) The spec recommends a fallback strategy for UAs that do not support > the RFC 5987 encoding; this didn't work in Firefox 4 (as it picked > "filename" rather than "filename*", see > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588781>) but will work in > Firefox 5 (which just want to beta). Firefox 5 was released today. This means that I18Nized filenames now can be sent without UA sniffing, if it's ok for you to ignore Safari (which still doesn't have RFC2231/5987 support). See <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc6266.html#rfc.section.D> for the full story. > 3) The test cases at <http://greenbytes.de/tech/tc2231/> have been > augmented with parsing results based on a regexp-based parser embedded > into the XSLT that generates the page; this is work-in-progress and > currently only covers the generic syntax and not yet the RFC2231/5987 > encoding used in "filename*". In the meantime I also added code that decodes the 2231/5987-encoded parameters. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 18:20:33 UTC