- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:28:21 +1000
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Just saw it. Looks good, except I don't think we need to use so many RFC2119 MUST and SHOULDs; those are better to reserve for testable assertions. I'll get it into the bug so we don't forget it. Cheers, On 11/05/2011, at 3:55 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 03:28:03PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> I think you're generally right. >> >> See also: >> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/283 > > I was not aware of this one, it perfectly matches the issue indeed. > >> Suggestions for text welcome. > > I don't know if you noticed my last reply to Adrien, I suggested a > few lines to add to the end of p1-3.3. > > Cheers, > Willy > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2011 06:28:48 UTC