- From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 14:35:42 -0700
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 05/06/2011 02:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 5/6/2011 3:57 PM, Dzonatas Sol wrote: > >> Is there anything that prevents the Host: field being left out for the assumption of >> volatile (or no-cache) data is then in effect? >> > Huh? The Host: header is mandatory in HTTP/1.1, without it the only > appropriate response is 400. > We are aware of this. That 400 response would be an example of something that went out of bounds/scope. Thus, volatile. -- --- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol --- Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant
Received on Friday, 6 May 2011 21:37:12 UTC