- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 06:41:04 +0000
- To: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@commscope.com>
- cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F0404907213@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> , "Thomson, Martin" writes: >On 2011-05-03 at 16:16:57, Willy Tarreau wrote: >That was my initial thought too. Until I saw the description of no-transform, >which almost all of those examples will have to respect...if they want >to remain compliant. This is the crux of the matter: How can you as a privacy-desiring user know if they want to be compliant ? Squezing non-effective "please-protect-my-privacy" requests into HTTP is not going to have any practical effect at all, so we should not do it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 06:41:29 UTC