Re: Privacy and HTTP intermediaries

In message <>
, "Thomson, Martin" writes:
>On 2011-05-03 at 16:16:57, Willy Tarreau wrote:

>That was my initial thought too.  Until I saw the description of no-transform,
>which almost all of those examples will have to respect...if they want 
>to remain compliant.

This is the crux of the matter:  How can you as a privacy-desiring user
know if they want to be compliant ?

Squezing non-effective "please-protect-my-privacy" requests into HTTP
is not going to have any practical effect at all, so we should not do it.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 06:41:29 UTC