- From: Marsh Ray <marsh@extendedsubset.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:04:40 +0000
- To: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
- CC: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, websec <websec@ietf.org>, Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten@ietf.org>, "http-auth@ietf.org" <http-auth@ietf.org>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 12/19/2010 03:49 PM, Ben Laurie wrote: > On 19 December 2010 11:12, Adrien de Croy<adrien@qbik.com> wrote: >> Imagine if >> everyone needed a client certificate to send any mail. We'd have no spam. > > Nonsense. We'd just restrict spam to owned machines, of which there > are only a few tens or hundreds of milliions, if we're lucky. Nonsense. We'd have no mail. Or rather some other store-and-forward messaging system would arise and not be called mail. Look back far enough and you'll find all kinds of "electronic mail" services implementing the full range of peer and end user authentication, and sender-pays models. There was no spam on those systems, or at least not enough that anyone felt like they needed a word for it. Guess why we use the one we use today. - Marsh
Received on Sunday, 19 December 2010 22:39:48 UTC