- From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:40:49 +0300
- To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
- CC: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, websec <websec@ietf.org>, "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>, "http-auth@ietf.org" <http-auth@ietf.org>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Yoav Nir wrote: >EAP has one advantage. It is easy to integrate with existing RADIUS/DIAMETER infrastructure. > True. And SASL has an advantage that it is easier to integrate with LDAP infrastructure. I think this just demonstrates that before an HTTP authentication mechanism can be evaluated, people need to agree on a common evaluation criteria for HTTP authentication.
Received on Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:41:31 UTC