- From: Mike Kelly <mike@mykanjo.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:18:27 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, nathan@webr3.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Ok - how does that leave the cache invalidation rule for C-L and Location? Do the same concerns over trust not apply? Cheers, Mike On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > On 08/11/2010, at 3:33 AM, Mike Kelly wrote: >> >> Out of interest; has anyone explored the possibility of a specific >> cache-control directive that could indicate that the cache conditions >> apply to the Content-Location URI? > > > The problem is one of trust; if you own http://example.com/~mike/a and I own http://example.com/~mark/b, you don't want my responses making asserting things about yours. > > What's interesting is that there's talk in a few different places (mostly security communities, e.g., WEBSEC and the W3C) about policy frameworks; this may provide something to hang these sorts of semantics off of as well. > > Cheers, > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 11:19:06 UTC