- From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:29:05 -0800
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Adam, you can do that either openly on the mailing list, or as a design team (i.e., work with other interested parties separately and bring a proposal forward when you think you're ready). I'd encourage you to do it openly on the list, to get constructive feedback from others as you go (thereby increasing your chances of delivering something people will accept). However, if Adam does this, I'd ask people not to question *why* it's being done. > > If it's done in time, and if we gather consensus on it, it can go into C-D as an optional appendix. If it's not ready in time, it can be published (by the WG or separately) on its own. Likewise, if the WG doesn't gain consensus on it, it can be published individually (in the IETF or elsewhere). > > Right now, I'm thinking three weeks -- November 30th (coincidentally, my birthday). This will give us time to re-publish, gain consensus (or not) and go to IETF Last Call by the end of the year. > > Adam, is that workable for you? Yes, that should be enough time. Thanks, Adam
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 08:30:16 UTC