issue 264: language tagging, was: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp

On 02.11.2010 05:52, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
>> Also, we should remove the language tagging facility
>> because it is gratuitous.
> I also agree with this. There is currently no OS or any related facility
> that 'knows' in any way in what language its filenames are. There is
> also no way for a user to enter that information, in the interfaces I
> know. There is also no practice of language negotiation for filenames
> (there is language negotiation for different language versions of
> content, where as a result the filenames may also be different, but
> that's a different thing).

I made this <>:


1) At the end of 3.1, add:

"Note: the format used for ext-value allows specifying a natural 
language; this is of limited use for filenames and is likely to be 
ignored by recipients."

2) In Section 4, language tagging is used in one example; modify the 
example not to use it.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2010 19:26:34 UTC