- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:25:06 +0100
- To: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 02.11.2010 18:15, Adam Barth wrote: > ... >> Maybe those sites just gave up on IE and Chrome, and have been sending >> filename* to everybody else for a long time? >> >> It would *really* be useful to get beyond the hearsay and actually get data. > > I don't have that data off hand. We can gather it. It just takes > time and effort. > ... Understood. But I think you really need to support that claim with data. If the data is obtained by through Chrome users we will also have get access to the actual site names that do this, checking whether they already have separate code paths for different browsers. Also, related to issue 263, it would be great if you could find out whether Chrome always use UTF-8 when percent-unescaping, or tried to follow IE. I know that Asian IE installations *did* not use UTF-8 unless the browser was configured for use of UTF-8 when *generating* URIs. It would be great if we could confirm what the exact condition is though. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2010 17:25:44 UTC