Re: #250 / #251 (connect bodies)

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 04:41:14PM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> It's not free, as evidenced by the hoops that are being jumped through to try to make sure that it isn't treated like HTTP.

No, we're trying to make sure it *is* treated like HTTP even on non
completely HTTP compliant stacks which could possibly treat the tunnelled
data as HTTP too while they must not. Otherwise, the 101+upgrade perfectly
fits the purpose.


Received on Friday, 29 October 2010 06:07:51 UTC