Re: #233: Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods?

On 23.10.2010 00:47, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I think we can leave it out for now; it's pretty obvious to someone looking at the * form, and I imagine we're going to do at least one more sweep through the specs for such considerations before we're done.

-> <>

Note that I also added

"State that the asterisk form is allowed for the OPTIONS method only."

to "Changes from RFC 2616".

Best regards, Julian

Received on Saturday, 23 October 2010 08:03:16 UTC