- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:57:53 +0200
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- CC: William Waites <ww@styx.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 19.10.2010 21:48, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > ... >> Perhaps the new draft would benefit from some more explicit >> treatment of this case to avoid confusion. > > No. I don't think anyone who reads the spec can conclude anything > other than what you did. People who don't read specs will not be > helped by more words in the spec. > ... +1 I was looking at this as well just a few minutes ago, and it already says: "Each media-range MAY be followed by one or more accept-params, beginning with the "q" parameter for indicating a relative quality factor. The first "q" parameter (if any) separates the media-range parameter(s) from the accept-params. Quality factors allow the user or user agent to indicate the relative degree of preference for that media-range, using the qvalue scale from 0 to 1 (Section 6.4 of [Part1]). The default value is q=1." -- <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-11.html#header.accept> Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2010 19:58:30 UTC