- From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:26:50 -0600
- To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "Gavin Peters (蓋文彼德斯)" <gavinp@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Alexey Melnikov wrote: > > Mark Nottingham wrote: > > >I think the only really bad/damaging thing here is starting with an > >"X-" header. > > Maybe it is time to deprecate the X- convention, as it doesn't seem > to be working. > "In the future, more top-level types may be defined only by a standards-track extension to this standard. If another top-level type is to be used for any reason, it must be given a name starting with "X-" to indicate its non-standard status and to avoid a potential conflict with a future official name." http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2045 It's RFC 2045 you'd need to change, not HTTP... -Eric
Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 08:27:27 UTC