- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:29:37 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, "William Chan (?????????)" <willchan@chromium.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 09:25:35AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 18.10.2010 05:17, Mark Nottingham wrote: > >... > >I tend to agree, SHOULD vs. MUST here isn't worth a tremendous amount of > >time. However, if we get agreement among UA implementers on MUST, that > >does seem the way to go. > > > >Julian, have you put in any text about duplicate content-length values yet? > >... > > No. We wouldn't need it if we stick with SHOULD, right? The fact that that sometimes happens might cause some browsers to loosen the check due to negative user feedback. Specifically focusing the control on different values will help developers satisfy users demand and security controls. Regards, Willy
Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 07:30:17 UTC