Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 01:57:00PM -0700, William Chan (?????????) wrote:
> First bug report wrt to this change:
>  Indeed, this is a
> duplicate Content-Length (not mismatching).

Indeed! So now we have one good reason to suggest relaxing the test in order
to accept exact duplicates.

The algorithm I used to check for non-duplicates multiple entries was simple :
compute the min and the max of the values found. If min != max, then error.

Thank you for this useful report of a live anomaly.


Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 03:18:40 UTC