Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths

No, I did not gather that information.

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Any idea of how many of those were duplicates (ie not mismatching)?
>
>
> On 08/10/2010, at 11:55 AM, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
> FWIW, on Windows Chrome 7.0.536.2 (a recent dev channel release), .0009% of
> main frames (where an error would result in a user-visible Chrome network
> error page, which we don't show for subresources) have responses with
> multiple content-lengths.
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:01 AM, William Chan (陈智昌) <<willchan@chromium.org>
> willchan@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Adam Barth < <w3c@adambarth.com>
>> w3c@adambarth.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:28 PM, William Chan (陈智昌)
>>> < <willchan@chromium.org>willchan@chromium.org> wrote:
>>> > From the brief discussion amongst the Chrome network developers, we
>>> plan to
>>> > discard the response and display an error.
>>>
>>> What sort of error message are you planing to display in the case that
>>> Mark asked about (a CSS stylesheet with multiple Content-Length
>>> headers)?
>>>
>>> Adam
>>>
>>
>> I missed that comment.  That's an interesting point.  Unless bug reports /
>> user metrics indicate this merits special handling, or we have confidence
>> this is an attack rather than a buggy server, I'd have no current plans to
>> treat it differently from any other network error, which gets logged and
>> results in a resource load failure for WebKit.
>>
>
>