- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:24:02 +0200
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:51:04 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 29.09.2010 13:28, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> Agreed, but it is way more ugly than what the other browsers do in my >> opinion and might cause people to avoid using POST (in favor of CHICKEN) >> just because of this rather than simply start using 307 which will work >> everywhere. > > I'm not concerned so much about new stuff; yes, we should recommend 307 > if you want method preservation. > > I *am* concerned about cases where 301 and 302 *today* are used as > described in RFC 2616 (non-browser scenarios). Those would break today if they use POST in IE and would break everywhere else completely. Those would work today if they switched to 307. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 1 October 2010 11:24:54 UTC