- From: Fred Bohle <Fred.Bohle@progress.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:59:07 -0500
- To: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 4 December 2009 16:00:46 UTC
We support a web server on z/OS mainframes. In this product, we support HTTP 1.1 persistent connections. We routinely return a response with Connection: Keep-Alive headers. If the connection remains idle for a while, we simply close the connection. Now I am getting a request to change this behavior. I am being asked, after the idle timeout, to send an EXTRA response, with a Connection: Close header. This seems odd to me. Sending an extra response seems like it introduces an instability: If the client sends a request at the same time as we are sending the extra response, the client could think we processed the request, when we did not. How do other servers handle the idle connection timeout? Fred Bohle Progress Software
Received on Friday, 4 December 2009 16:00:46 UTC