- From: Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:54:25 -0800
- To: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> wrote: > On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Tyler Close wrote: > >> The 307 redirect target resource is a good guy. The webbot and the >> redirect target live behind the same firewall. The evil resource lives >> outside the firewall. For the protection of the good guy resource, the >> webbot must enforce the SOP, so that the redirect is not followed. No HTML >> is involved in this scenario. Whose specification of the SOP is the webbot >> enforcing? Of what assistance should libcurl be in enforcing the SOP? > > Oh right. I think understand what you're saying now. You want the HTTP > client to somehow detect that it isn't allowed to follow redirects to that > target (in that manner) and stop because a SOP somehow says so. Yes. > How do you suggest that would be told to the client? The SOP rule is something like: Don't follow a cross-domain redirect of a PUT request, unless the redirect target has opted out of SOP protection. So, upon seeing the 307 redirect, libcurl would report an error if the origin of the Request-URI does not match the origin of the URL in the Location header; otherwise, the redirect is followed. Until there's a standard way for a resource to opt out of SOP, that's the best that can be done. > Couldn't the TARGET here rather use Referer (or Origin or what not) to > detect that there's a redirect coming from externally and ignore it? It could, but it doesn't. Today, the target resource expects the SOP to protect it from non-same-origin PUT requests. > It clearly can't be HTTPbis material though, since in my eyes it seems to be > a rather major extension or change of what HTTP is and what it allows today. The thing is, it's not an extension or a change. It's the status-quo. Existing resources depend upon clients enforcing the SOP. We've just left it unspecified what those protections are. Currently, these protections are a widely relied upon oral tradition. --Tyler -- "Waterken News: Capability security on the Web" http://waterken.sourceforge.net/recent.html
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 22:54:59 UTC