Re: Authorization with WWW-Authenticate (bis)

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
> What is unspecified is how the user agent should behave if none of the
> provided challenges is understood. It seems to me that most user agents
> then fall back on basic auth with unspecified realm which imho is not a
> bad thing to do. Both unlikely to be accepted by the server AND exposing
> password details in the plain for no good value, better to abort the
> request with an error.

All user agents I tested just displayed the response entity, except
Opera pre-10 which displayed an error page about the auth scheme not
being recognized:
http://hg.ltgt.net/http-cookie-auth/raw-file/tip/ua-compat.html

-- 
Thomas Broyer
/tɔ.ma.bʁwa.je/

Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2009 23:12:52 UTC