- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:53:43 +1100
- To: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>
- Cc: "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'Lisa Dusseault'" <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com>, "'HTTP Working Group'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
So, are any changes in the draft necessary, in your collective opinion? On 20/10/2009, at 2:33 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> On Oct 19, 2009, at 6:38 PM, Brian Smith wrote: >> There is nothing stopping the patch format from including a >> strong version indicator, content hash, or even a context-based >> collaborative merging mechanism in the format itself. The notion >> that PATCH must use conditionals is absurd given that the original >> idea came from the patch command that intentionally supports >> non-overlapping edits in any sequence. > > Yes, of course. I overlooked the obvious there. > Regards, > Brian > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 02:54:19 UTC