- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:14:09 +1100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
On 08/10/2009, at 9:08 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > > OK, change applied with <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/712 > > (which has broken checkin comment, sorry for that). Closing issue. Julian, at some point it would probably be good to update the change note to reflect that this wasn't done just because of poor implementation take-up; the reason behind that was that using C-L for base caused problems with conneg and other situations (IIRC). > I note that in <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/ > 154>, we have: > >> Note that this differs from the MIME header of same name. > > Is this something that requires spec text, or was that just a > reminder that HTTP and MIME are allowed to differ with respect to > this? Don't think it requires any spec text; that wasn't part of the on-list discussion. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 14 October 2009 03:14:43 UTC