Re: [httpbis] #81: Content Negotiation for media types

Scheduling for -08.


On 21/09/2009, at 2:13 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> I think the intent was to replace the first four sections, and to  
> give the editors license to adjust the subsequent text in 4.1-4.3.
>
> Julian, does that work for you?
>
> Any objections to this?
>
>
>
> On 17/09/2009, at 6:56 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
>> Larry Masinter wrote:
>>> Although http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/81
>>> is marked 'closed', Mark sent a strawman rewrite:
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2009JulSep/ 
>>> 0521.html
>>> After review by Mark, here is a proposed rewrite:
>>> ...
>>
>> The text sounds good so far, but I'm not really sure how it would  
>> be put into Part 3.
>>
>> In particular: would it replace Section 4 completely? In which case  
>> we may be losing useful information. On the other hand, if it only  
>> replaces the first four paragraphs, there will be an overlap with  
>> the subsequent text...
>>
>> BR, Julian
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
>
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2009 04:32:47 UTC