Re: Input on request for link relation

On 24/09/2009, at 7:37 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> It would certainly be an improvement, though I'm still unconvinced  
> that we
> want different definitions for the same link type for different MIME
> types. Difference conformance classes, sure, but that's another issue.

Yes, that's the tricky part; there would be a tendency to define  
different meanings for different mime types, no matter how clearly  
it's stated that the additional information was restricted to the  
interpretation/implementation of the relations.

Mark Nottingham

Received on Sunday, 27 September 2009 00:19:49 UTC