Re: [httpbis] #81: Content Negotiation for media types

I think the intent was to replace the first four sections, and to give  
the editors license to adjust the subsequent text in 4.1-4.3.

Julian, does that work for you?

Any objections to this?

On 17/09/2009, at 6:56 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Larry Masinter wrote:
>> Although
>> is marked 'closed', Mark sent a strawman rewrite:
>> After review by Mark, here is a proposed rewrite:
>> ...
> The text sounds good so far, but I'm not really sure how it would be  
> put into Part 3.
> In particular: would it replace Section 4 completely? In which case  
> we may be losing useful information. On the other hand, if it only  
> replaces the first four paragraphs, there will be an overlap with  
> the subsequent text...
> BR, Julian

Mark Nottingham

Received on Monday, 21 September 2009 04:13:56 UTC