Re: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard

Sam Johnston wrote:
> ...
> For example, I was looking for a relation to describe the "most recent 
> version" of a resource (as distinct from a specific version in a VCS). 
> I'd have used "current" were it not for its definition in RFC 5005 as "a 
> feed document containing the most recent entries in the feed" (for which 
> 'recent' would have been a better term IMO). Now I need to either try to 
> shift the existing definition or find another like 'latest' - without 
> regard to the registry we'd have ended up with two conflicting definitions.
> ...


 > ...

BR, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2009 09:55:58 UTC