Re: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard from Mark Nottingham on 2009-09-01 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2009)

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:52:19 +1000
To: Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>
Cc: Joe Gregorio <joe@bitworking.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <36D97992-0CD4-4B9B-80A3-B322E170FE4D@mnot.net>

Yes, that's what they are.


On 01/09/2009, at 2:24 PM, Sam Johnston wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> The easiest way for them to use the link framework would be to use  
> extension relations for ones that are specific to their  
> application... i.e., not register them.
>
> Right, but in that case they should use URLs, right?
>
> Sam
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2009 06:53:05 UTC