Re: [draft-nottingham-http-link-header-06] relation-types

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:08:55 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> It will be invalid.
> 
> As far as I can tell the draft does not define what it means for something to be invalid. Even if it did, presumably that still leaves my remaining two points.
 > ...

Invalid means invalid. The outcome is undefined.

BR, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 08:26:10 UTC