- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:08:01 +1000
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 24/08/2009, at 12:20 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> >> Anne? Ian? IIRC both of your requested the removal of "rev"; how do >> you >> feel about leaving it in the grammar but strengthening the text to >> clarify that implementations are not required to interpret / use it? > > My ideal situation would be for rev=""'s semantics and (more > importantly) > user agent conformance criteria to be fully defined in detail, but > for the > authoring conformance criteria to make _use_ of rev="" non-conforming. I.e., define the semantics of rev in case it's received, but prohibit sending it? -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 24 August 2009 03:08:48 UTC