Re: Issue 187 (Warn header (P6) vs RFC2047 encoding)

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> +1. Talking about languages when the charset is constrained -- as well 
>> as when it's not intended for end-user interpretation -- makes no sense.
>>
>> I'd be more reticent to take this path, BTW, if there were any 
>> implementation of Warning in UAs. However, since as far as we know 
>> there isn't, it seems reasonable.
>> ...
> 
> Ack.
> 
> I have removed more text, proposed patch: 
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/187/187.2.diff>. 
> ...

I have applied the proposed patch with 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/669>.

BR, Julian

Received on Friday, 7 August 2009 05:56:16 UTC