- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:17:16 +0200
- To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- CC: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com>, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
John Cowan wrote: > Julian Reschke scripsit: > >> The intention was to normatively refer to that matching algorithm that >> actually is equivalent to what RFC2616 used to define (remember, we're >> not changing the protocol here). Did we pick the wrong one? > > No, basic filtering is the RFC 2616 algorithm all right. You might > consider allowing HTTP servers to do lookup if basic filtering > produces no results: Apache already does this. > > Is there some reason why you aren't referring to BCP 47? The spec does refer to BCP 47: <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-07.html#RFC4647>. BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 18 July 2009 18:18:05 UTC