Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)

John Cowan wrote:
> Julian Reschke scripsit:
>> The intention was to normatively refer to that matching algorithm that 
>> actually is equivalent to what RFC2616 used to define (remember, we're 
>> not changing the protocol here). Did we pick the wrong one?
> No, basic filtering is the RFC 2616 algorithm all right.  You might
> consider allowing HTTP servers to do lookup if basic filtering
> produces no results: Apache already does this.
> Is there some reason why you aren't referring to BCP 47?

The spec does refer to BCP 47: 

BR, Julian

Received on Saturday, 18 July 2009 18:18:05 UTC