Re: Chopan - Compressed HTTP Over PANs (draft-frank-6lowpan-chopan-00)

Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2009, at 12:48, Jim Gettys wrote:
>> that it be shown to be significantly more compact than HTTP
> It is worth pointing out that saving bytes is one goal; saving code 
> complexity is another significant goal.  Tight binary coding with few 
> options is much easier to parse than a lenient text-based protocol on an 
> 8-bit processor with 48 KiB of flash.
> That said, whether the result of such an effort still is HTTP is the 
> interesting question.

Exactly.  Though it's not clear that the stated devices are having to 
parse the protocol, rather than just a client implementation generating 
a small subset of HTTP.

Of course, it also isn't clear how many people still use 8 bit 
processors with 48K of flash (which aren't probably running an IPv6 
stack, either).

And yes, HTTP parsing is radically more complex and takes a lot more 
code than roughly equivalent binary code frameworks.  But you don't have 
  to write them from scratch, either.  And for reasons I've never 
understood, some folks seem to think writing such binary protocols is 
hard.  They are just different (though many binary protocols have made 
insufficient/incorrect provisions for extensibility). X11, for example, 
made some (non-fatal) mistakes in that area.
                           - Jim

Received on Tuesday, 14 July 2009 11:27:11 UTC