- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:57:30 -0700
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "collinj@cs.stanford.edu" <collinj@cs.stanford.edu>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Mark Nottingham<mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > That perspective is understandable, if you're starting from a clean slate. > From where I sit, every time somebody adds a new type of syntax, new > parsing code has to be written, increasing the chance of errors. It also > means that people have to learn yet another specialized syntax rather than > leveraging existing knowledge. The quotes are kind of disaster, no? What if we see single quotes? What if the quotes aren't there? These kinds of issues have plagued the Content-Type header. Adam
Received on Sunday, 12 July 2009 23:58:31 UTC