- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:32:54 -0500
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
On Jul 9, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Jul 9, 2009, at 9:04 AM, Pat Hayes wrote: >> Hmm, then I am puzzled. Does 303 redirection really imply that >> the server **does not have** a transferable representation? > > If the server has a transferable representation, it would > respond to the GET with the appropriate status code (200 or 304). > Well, yes, IF it were driven solely by what one might call rational HTTP architectural principles. BUt surely the whole issue about httprange14 is that it introduces new principles which on their face have nothing to do with http architecture as such, but to do with denotation and naming. If the URI in the GET request is not intended to denote the resource to which the GET is directed, then that resource must issue a 303 redirection, and must not return a representation using a 200 status code. That has nothing to do with the existence or not of such a representation. Even if the representation exists and the server has access to it, it cannot return it with a 200 code when the URI is intended to denote some other thing, in particular a non-information resource of some kind. If we follow your rule, above, and also httprange14, then a server can be placed in an impossible position. If it has a representation of itself which could be put into a 200-code response, and it receives a GET request with a URI which it knows (somehow, perhaps by some externally agreed convention) is being used to denote a non- information resource; what should it do? HTTPrange14 requires it to not deliver a 200-coded reply, but your criterion requires that it must. This is why I think the wording should make absilutely minimal assumptions about what exactly the 303 means. Pat > ....Roy > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 9 July 2009 23:34:16 UTC