Re: Review of new HTTPbis text for 303 See Other

Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> ...
> That's because you happen to be reading it differently than
> what I was thinking when I wrote it.  The sentence is a bit
> ambiguous if you don't pay attention to what the second "that"
> means.  If it is reordered to say
>  A 303 response to a GET request indicates that the server does
>  not have a transferable representation of the requested resource
>  and is instead redirecting the client to some other resource
>  for further information.
> then I think the objection is handled without watering down
> the purpose of using the status code on a GET.
> ....Roy

Sounds good to me.

BR, Julian

Received on Thursday, 9 July 2009 10:49:01 UTC