- From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2009 04:21:17 UTC
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > mån 2009-06-29 klockan 12:43 +1200 skrev Adrien de Croy: > >> Actually this highlights some problems in the structure of 13.1.1 >> Cache Correctness. > > That section no longer exists at all. Was removed as it apparently needs > a complete rewrite. > > http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-latest.html > > But I don't see how that is relevant to no-store. Replies with no-store > isn't even allowed to enter the cache in the first place, and things > which aren't in the cache can not be validated per the HTTP model. Reflecting on the original intent I recall for 'no-store', it meant can't be stored in a persisent memory cache ... e.g., written to disk. It was not intented to mean no-cache to the extent that a user agent might have in memory cache which under other rules would still require revalidation.
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2009 04:21:17 UTC